Technology, Security & The Geopolitics of the Firm

States have a strategic interest in adopting emerging technologies. This is especially true of digital technologies as battlefields become more ambiguously defined across civilian infrastructure and awash in data. This adoption relies on an often-contested relationship with technology firms, including some of the largest corporations assembled since the French Revolution. The nature of this contest, and the choice of strategies by states, and firms, to compete more effectively, has significant implications for the design and adoption of digital technologies, the political power of non-state groups, and the security of the United States and its allies.  

This collection of applied research projects works to understand the mechanics of contestation between firms and the state, the strategies states use to influence the security of digital technologies, how the adoption of different kinds of technologies by states influences public-private political dynamics, and the diffusion of offensive digital technologies developed or employed by non-state groups. This work takes an explicitly interdisciplinary approach and works to translate findings into practical recommendations for different policymaking communities.  

KEY AREAS OF FOCUS

  • THE INDUSTRIAL POLITICS OF COMPUTING

    How ‘openness’ in digital computing intersects with user’s security, the market for cloud services, and anti-trust policies.

  • SPYWARE PROLIFERATION

    How the development, sale, and support of software used for digital espionage affects human rights and international security

  • TRANSNATIONAL REGULATION & SECURE BY DESIGN

    Multiple governments are working to induce technology companies to develop more secure digital technologies but these efforts pose challenging questions of vertical regulation within borders and horizonal regulation across them. Is there an international future for “secure by design”?   

  • NON-STATE, MARKET-DRIVEN, SECURITY GOVERNANCE

    Description goes What role can entities like insurance firms play in governing the security outcomes of organizations? Where are there opportunities to reinforce or even replace public sector authority with private sector institutions, without reverting to ‘voluntary’ mechanisms?  here

RECENT PUBLICATIONS